How islam reached india

How many brothers were slain, or whether any were slain at all, is however a question that is still debatable. Buddhist monks were vegetarians Most people associate Buddhism with non-violence and imagine that Buddhist monks and nuns never consumed animal food.

However, according to Nayanjot Lahiri, the idea that meat and its products were not allowed to Buddhist monks is a myth. For instance, in case of sickness, raw flesh and blood could be used by the monks.

Fish and meat were mentioned among the five superior and delicate foods that a monk who was unwell was allowed to eat. Irfan Habib, former professor of history at Aligarh Muslim University, agreed that monks could eat meat.

The only restriction, however, was that they could not eat the meat of animals especially slaughtered for them. Buddhist sutras also mention that one may, with a clear conscience, receive, cook and eat meat either freely offered by someone else, or that which came from an animal which had died of natural causes, but not of that which had been especially slaughtered for eating.

Even the archaeology of Buddhism provides some evidence on this, says Lahiri, as animal bones have been recorded from two famous Buddhist sites in Sri Lanka—the Abhayagiri vihara at Anuradhapura and the Sigiriya vihara—which indicate that Buddhist monks were not vegetarian.

The tragedy, however, is that the epic romance was probably just a work of fiction. For, Anarkali never existed. Or, even if she did, she was probably a slave girl who had no proven connection with either Salim or his father, the Emperor Akbar. History, however, suggests otherwise.

Since she belonged to the royal family of Jodhpur, she was also referred to as Jodha Bai. According to Farooqi, she was a very important woman in the royal household. Besides being married to the emperor, she was also the mother of Khurram, who later became Emperor Shah Jahan. Facebook Twitter Linkedin EMail. Start a Conversation.

Follow us on. He encountered little resistance as he made his way into India. When he reached the city of Nerun, on the banks of the Indus River, he was welcomed into the city by the Buddhist monks that controlled it. Most cities along the Indus thus voluntarily came under Muslim control, with no fighting. In some cases, oppressed Buddhist minorities reached out to the Muslim armies for protection against Hindu governors.

Despite the support and approval of much of the population, the Raja of Sindh, Dahir, opposed the Muslim expansion and mobilized his army against Muhammad bin Qasim. In , the two armies met, with a decisive victory for the Muslims. With the victory, all of Sindh came under Muslim control. It is important to note, however, that the population of Sindh was not forced to convert to Islam at all.

In fact, for almost everyone, there was no change in day-to-day life. Muhammad bin Qasim promised security and religious freedom to all Hindus and Buddhists under his control.

For example, the Brahman caste continued their jobs as tax collectors and Buddhists monks continued to maintain their monasteries. Due to his religious tolerance and justice, many cities regularly greeted him and his armies with people dancing and music. Patterns of Conversion The successive waves of Muslim armies penetrating into India followed much the same pattern.

Leaders such as Mahmud of Ghazni and Muhammad Tughluq expanded Muslim political domains without altering the religious or social fabric of Indian society. Because pre-Islamic India was entirely based on a caste system in which society was broken into separate parts, conversion to Islam happened in a step-by-step process. Often, entire castes would convert to Islam at a time.

This would happen for many different reasons. In the caste system, who you are born to determines your position in society. There was no opportunity for social mobility or to achieve greater than what your parents achieved. By converting to Islam, people had the opportunity to move up in society, and no longer were subservient to the Brahman caste.

Buddhism, which was once very popular in the subcontinent, slowly died out under Muslim rule. Traditionally, when people wanted to escape the caste system, they would move to the major population centers and convert to Buddhism.

When Islam became an option, however, people began to convert to Islam instead of Buddhism, while still leaving the caste system. The myths of Islam violently destroying Buddhism in India are simply false.

Buddhists were tolerated under Muslim rule and no evidence exists that shows forced conversions or violence against them. Wandering teachers also had a major role in bringing Islam to the masses.

Muslim scholars traveled throughout India, making it their goal to educate people about Islam.